The Bill Of The Richter Scale

By Tara Coyle
The Peanut Gallery
on Homeland Security:

Tensions are flying in the congressional Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding the problems involved within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Democrats and Republicans alike are striving for a political agreement that can lead to a more effective system. Popularly cited thoughts in the debate include keeping FEMA under the wing of the DHS or changing its size; though, the idea proposed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), brings something new to the table.

Frank strives for action, and is proposing the idea of a rating system within FEMA, and under the federal government control of the DHS. A one to five scale would rate natural disasters measuring how much aid and resources need to be given and used. In having this scale, FEMA would be able to appropriate their means in a more efficient manner. This way they would not waste their sources nor would they lack the proper sources to give.

Frank emphasizes his stance by saying; “Scale is a good way to increase efficiency and oversight without sacrificing aid.” There needs to be a division or some type of separation between the labeling and defining of disasters. With this type of system put into place, the proper aid can be given.

But can this scale really be effective? FEMA, managed by the DHS since 2003, hasn’t proven itself as an organization just yet, and this idea could put too much power into vulnerable hands. The scaling system needs to be highly specific, monitored, and accurate. People ‘s lives and homes are at stake! If the system underestimates the damage, the result can be incredibly detrimental.

With a strong democratic backing, along with the support of the conservative Heritage Foundation behind him, maybe Frank will have enough wind in his sails, to pass his bill.